<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I&#8217;ve got Google cornered on Spam Huntress!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.annelisabeth.com/blog/2005/02/20/ive-got-google-cornered-on-spam-huntress/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.annelisabeth.com/blog/2005/02/20/ive-got-google-cornered-on-spam-huntress/</link>
	<description>writes about tech, faith and whatever</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 01:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Elliott Back</title>
		<link>http://www.annelisabeth.com/blog/2005/02/20/ive-got-google-cornered-on-spam-huntress/#comment-425</link>
		<dc:creator>Elliott Back</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2005 10:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annelisabeth.com/blog/2005/02/20/ive-got-google-cornered-on-spam-huntress/#comment-425</guid>
		<description>The word "huntress" is unique--combined with "spam" and you have quite a combo.  Now, the problem is the parts.  For example, the two words "Elliott Back" are 1000 more common than "spam huntress" but we're both in the top of Google.  Now, if we go with either "Elliott" (31) or "back" (&#60;1000), the rankings fall way down.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The word &#8220;huntress&#8221; is unique&#8211;combined with &#8220;spam&#8221; and you have quite a combo.  Now, the problem is the parts.  For example, the two words &#8220;Elliott Back&#8221; are 1000 more common than &#8220;spam huntress&#8221; but we&#8217;re both in the top of Google.  Now, if we go with either &#8220;Elliott&#8221; (31) or &#8220;back&#8221; (&lt;1000), the rankings fall way down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

