Comments on: Some shouldn’t have to spam http://www.annelisabeth.com/blog/2005/01/27/some-shouldnt-have-to-spam/ writes about tech, faith and whatever Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:01:23 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 By: 0xTC blog http://www.annelisabeth.com/blog/2005/01/27/some-shouldnt-have-to-spam/#comment-278 0xTC blog Fri, 28 Jan 2005 13:55:56 +0000 http://www.annelisabeth.com/blog/2005/01/27/some-shouldnt-have-to-spam/#comment-278 <strong>Re: The machines misused by this particular group...</strong> I see both types of this abuse (Spam mail by Trojan and spam posts by proxy) as being part of the same problem. Anonymous public proxies are also a part of this problem. Re: The machines misused by this particular group…

I see both types of this abuse (Spam mail by Trojan and spam posts by proxy) as being part of the same problem. Anonymous public proxies are also a part of this problem.

]]> By: alfons http://www.annelisabeth.com/blog/2005/01/27/some-shouldnt-have-to-spam/#comment-277 alfons Thu, 27 Jan 2005 08:08:55 +0000 http://www.annelisabeth.com/blog/2005/01/27/some-shouldnt-have-to-spam/#comment-277 Ha! I even found a spammer "refering" to IAEA's sister organisation in Norway! (I think most of them meant to circumvent the "smarter" honey pots, that check for referer and IP) Ha! I even found a spammer “refering” to IAEA’s sister organisation in Norway!
(I think most of them meant to circumvent the “smarter” honey pots, that check for referer and IP)

]]>