<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reliability of the press</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.annelisabeth.com/blog/2004/06/02/reliability-of-the-press/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.annelisabeth.com/blog/2004/06/02/reliability-of-the-press/</link>
	<description>writes about tech, faith and whatever</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 20:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://www.annelisabeth.com/blog/2004/06/02/reliability-of-the-press/#comment-77</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2004 03:06:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annelisabeth.com/blog/2004/06/02/reliability-of-the-press/#comment-77</guid>
		<description>Lars:

And then there's the NYT, which might be the most left-wing biased paper out there, INTENTIONALLY reporting things in error toward their very own bias, then issuing corrections buried in two lines on page 66 somewhere.  They have habitually done that over the years, and I'm certain will continue to do so.

No, Ann...I'm not opinionated or anything. :-)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lars:</p>
<p>And then there&#8217;s the NYT, which might be the most left-wing biased paper out there, INTENTIONALLY reporting things in error toward their very own bias, then issuing corrections buried in two lines on page 66 somewhere.  They have habitually done that over the years, and I&#8217;m certain will continue to do so.</p>
<p>No, Ann&#8230;I&#8217;m not opinionated or anything. <img src='http://www.annelisabeth.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ann</title>
		<link>http://www.annelisabeth.com/blog/2004/06/02/reliability-of-the-press/#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>Ann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2004 00:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annelisabeth.com/blog/2004/06/02/reliability-of-the-press/#comment-76</guid>
		<description>Yep, I've gotten things wrong too.

But this wasn't getting things wrong, it was a case of forcing a story.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, I&#8217;ve gotten things wrong too.</p>
<p>But this wasn&#8217;t getting things wrong, it was a case of forcing a story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lars Walker</title>
		<link>http://www.annelisabeth.com/blog/2004/06/02/reliability-of-the-press/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>Lars Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2004 09:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annelisabeth.com/blog/2004/06/02/reliability-of-the-press/#comment-75</guid>
		<description>If you talk to anyone who's ever done anything covered by the news, you'll learn that all news coverage contains errors. Sometimes it's due to laziness. Sometimes it's due to deadline pressures. Sometimes it's due to bias. But I try to remember that, in the short time I was a reporter, I got things wrong too. I think total accuracy is impossible for human beings.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you talk to anyone who&#8217;s ever done anything covered by the news, you&#8217;ll learn that all news coverage contains errors. Sometimes it&#8217;s due to laziness. Sometimes it&#8217;s due to deadline pressures. Sometimes it&#8217;s due to bias. But I try to remember that, in the short time I was a reporter, I got things wrong too. I think total accuracy is impossible for human beings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://www.annelisabeth.com/blog/2004/06/02/reliability-of-the-press/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2004 05:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annelisabeth.com/blog/2004/06/02/reliability-of-the-press/#comment-74</guid>
		<description>And THAT'S just the BBC &#38; the New York Times! :-&#222;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And THAT&#8217;S just the BBC &amp; the New York Times! :-&#222;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ann</title>
		<link>http://www.annelisabeth.com/blog/2004/06/02/reliability-of-the-press/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>Ann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2004 02:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.annelisabeth.com/blog/2004/06/02/reliability-of-the-press/#comment-73</guid>
		<description>Hehe...

Doug, did you get my e-mail? Have had some trouble with outgoing lately, so I thought I'd ask here. If you didn't get it, I'll resend.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hehe&#8230;</p>
<p>Doug, did you get my e-mail? Have had some trouble with outgoing lately, so I thought I&#8217;d ask here. If you didn&#8217;t get it, I&#8217;ll resend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

